|
|
|
|
|
home | contact us | rates & policies | for sale / wanted | lmc chat | bands | links |
||
|
The most recent articles appear first archive index
|
||
| The Citizen 14/11/02 |
THE
campaign to block 'big box retailing' on Lancaster's canal corridor has
been boosted after councillors promised to reject unsuitable bids for
its land, reports Steve Dunthorne. Cllrs
Tricia Heath and Geoff Wilson told a well-attended meeting of the Real
Planning for Lancaster group it wants developers to stick to a 'design
brief' for the site. That
calls for the creation of a 'cultural quarter' and rules out the mix of
a supermarket, new road and retailing in plans
suggested by developers, Chelverton. Cllr
Heath, the leader of the council, told the meeting at the Gregson
Centre: "The decision has already been made by the present cabinet
that we are not going to sell that land for box retailing. "We
have never said we are in favour of the Chelverton plan - we don't
really know much about it." She
also said that there were no plans at present to sell off the building
used by the musician's co-op, and said the cabinet would consider any
request for a longer lease, which would allow the group to bid for more
outside funding. Cllr
Wilson, the council's deputy leader, said the council had no need to
sell the land, adding: "I am pleased to say the council's finances
aren't in quite as bad a state as they were - we have £200/300,000 above the recommended
level of reserves." Prof
John Whitelegg, of the Bulk Ward Green party, described the potential
development as 'probably one of the most significant things to happen to
Bulk ward in years.' "The
brief that the city council have produced for
this particular development
is actually quite a good one," he added. The
group is still considering the possibility of applying for outline
planning permission or dealing with other developers who have been
involved in successful schemes else-where. The
group's next meeting takes place at 8pm next Thursday at the Gregson,
Moor Lane. Chelverton
announced its plans to a meeting of Lancaster's Chamber of Trade in
June, but has so far refused to meet with campaigners. No planning
application has been made. |